Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

"VICTORY": Progressive groups hail Obama"s Iran deal

Code Pink rally

Code Pink rally

TEL AVIV – The radical activist group Code Pink is “thrilled” about the West’s nuclear agreement with Iran, hailing it as a “victory for peace-loving people around the world.”

Code Pink joined scores of progressive groups Tuesday urging supporters to “take action” by imploring lawmakers to support the deal.

Some of those groups participated in a private strategy conference call with White House officials earlier this month in which they discussed ways of convincing lawmakers to support a deal with Iran.

“VICTORY!” Code Pink wrote in an email to members Tuesday. “The nuclear agreement is a great victory for peace-loving people around the world. … We are thrilled that after 30 months of grueling negotiations, a deal has been reached and we have averted another war in the Middle East.”

“Unfortunately,” Code Pink warned, the Republican leadership in Congress now has 60 days to sabotage the deal, putting us back on the path to confrontation with Iran.”

The activist group is asking members to “Take action and urge your Representative and Senators to support the deal!”

The group sends supporters to a petition posted at the website StopWarWithIran.com titled “Defend the Iran deal and stop Republicans from starting a war with Iran.”

The petition is sponsored by Code Pink and other far-left organizations, including CREDO Action, Campaign for America’s Future, Demand Progress, Daily Kos, MoveOn.org and Progressive Democrats for America.

Some of those groups participated in the conference call, which was organized by the anti-nuclear weapons advocacy group Ploughshares Fund.

The Ploughshares Fund opposes America’s development of a missile-defense system and itself disburses financing to scores of anti-war groups, WND previously reported.

What do YOU think? Sound off on Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran in today’s WND poll

According to the Washington Free Beacon, which reported it obtained an audio recording of the conference call, White House officials described Obama’s Iran negotiations as the president’s “signature foreign policy accomplishment,” a policy that must in turn be supported by Democrats.

“This has really been on the front burner from a foreign perspective, although not in the public eye necessarily, since the very beginning,” Matt Nosanchuk, an official in the White House Office of Public Engagement, told participants, according to the audio description. “This is not an issue of the day, this is really an issue of the presidency.”

An official with the White House’s Public Engagement office, John Bisognano, stressed “the importance of this to the president.”

“This is clearly an issue that is very close to his heart and something that’s extraordinarily important for the future of frankly the world,” Bisognano said. “I want to make sure everyone understands this is a top priority for the administration, and this is clearly something that we’re all focused on moving forward and excited about hoping that we can come to a solid agreement.”

Code Pink, meanwhile, is known for its activism against U.S. military intervention and has embarked on solidarity visits with such Western foes as Hamas and with leaders of the Taliban.

In 2004, Benjamin and Code Pink announced they would donate a combined $ 600,000 in medical supplies and cash to the families of the insurgents who were fighting American troops in Fallujah, Iraq.

Related commentary:

Western Christendom bows to Shia Islam, by Michele Bachmann

Related stories:

‘Time for Congress to get involved’ to stop Iran deal

Obama leaves 4 Americans behind in Iran deal

‘VICTORY’: Progressive groups hail Obama’s Iran deal

Ex-CIA chief: ‘Iran won the negotiations’

Iranian boasts are at odds with text of agreement

‘Sheer insanity’: Iran-deal critics go nuclear on Obama

Bolton: Deal with Iran is ‘an American Munich’

‘World can’t afford the risk of another dice roll’

Iran wins $ 18 billion in sanctions relief


WND » World
"VICTORY": Progressive groups hail Obama"s Iran deal

Sunday, June 21, 2015

"Iran nukes will be Israel"s gas chambers"

Secretary of State John Kerry negotiates with Iranians

Secretary of State John Kerry negotiates with Iranians

WASHINGTON – Stark sentiments and dire warnings on an occasion that was to be a night of celebration:

  • Iran’s nuclear weapons will be the new gas chambers for Israel.
  • It would cost only $ 2 billion to fix the threat that could destroy America at any moment, but Congress and the president ignore it.
  • We’re on the brink of disaster: The only chance the U.S. has of surviving is to be the best friend to Israel we can.
  • The FBI is investigating ISIS in all 50 states: The barbarians are not just at the gate, they are inside.
  • Israel’s enemies are America’s enemies. They target Israel today, America tomorrow.
  • Speaking out for the truth is not Islamophobic.
  • Amazing – a dinner where people are given awards for simply telling the truth.
  • Anti-semitism did not die at Auschwitz.

Those were just some of the poignant, sobering and insightful observations made by a roster of eminent speakers in a series of powerful speeches at an awards dinner on Thursday evening.

The event was the 9th annual “Rays of Light in the Darkness” awards ceremony and dinner held by the Endowment for Middle East Truth, or EMET.

The organization is a Washington, D.C., based think tank and policy center which informs and advises lawmakers and their staff, develops close working relationships with them, and challenges what it characterizes as “the falsehoods and misrepresentations that abound in U.S. Middle East policy.”

EMET describes its mission as working with lawmakers who “understand the importance of a strong and secure America, and a strong American-Israeli alliance against the forces of radical Islam and terror.”

Honorees were:

  • Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.
  • Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas
  • Talk show host Erick Stakelbeck
  • Muslim Zionist Kasim Hafeez
  • Canadian lawmaker Irwin Cotler
  • Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Other speakers included master of ceremonies, and former assistant secretary of defense, Frank Gaffney and EMET founder Sarah Stern. Talk radio host Mark Levin opened the event by leading the gathering in the pledge of allegiance to America.

Sen. Cotton was the only member of the Senate to vote against a bill that turned the chamber’s treaty powers upside down, when it comes to striking a deal with Iran. The tally 98 to 1, with one senator not voting.

By law, the Senate must approve any treaty with a foreign power by a two-thirds vote. The legislation, approved by the Senate in May, would require a deal with Iran on its nuclear program to be submitted to Congress. But, if Congress rejects the deal, President Obama could veto the rejection. The Senate and the House would then have to come up with a two-thirds majorities to override the veto. So, instead of a two-thirds Senate majority needed to approve the treaty, a two-thirds congressional majority would be needed to disapprove of it.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.

Cotton is also the senator who wrote an open letter informing Iran’s leaders that Congress has a constitutional role, by law, in ratifying international agreements. 46 Republican senators signed the letter.

The Senator was not able to address the EMET dinner in person because he was called to emergency meetings in Ukraine. The freshman is the youngest member of the Senate and a graduate of Harvard Law School. Emerging from the army with the rank of captain, Cotton served tours in Iraq and Afghanistan and was awarded the Bronze Star.

In recorded remarks played at the EMET dinner, Cotton stressed that the bottom line in any deal struck with Iran must be: Does it dismantle their nuclear program or not? If not, it should be rejected, he emphasized.

Cotton also noted that used to be the position of the Obama administration, but that has changed.

The senator emphasized a recurring theme of the evening: The importance of speaking the truth about the threats facing America’s allies and the rest of the world.

Rep. Gohmert was the driving force behind the speech given to Congress in March by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who received a remarkable 26 standing ovations while delivering a passionate warning against the Iranian nuclear peril.

Gohmert originally had the idea when Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was still House Speaker. He drafted a letter, signed by colleagues, proposing Netanyahu address Congress. That went nowhere, but Gohmert had better luck when Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, because House Speaker.

It was the texan who told the EMET dinner crowd that Iran’s nuclear weapons would be the new gas chambers for Israel.

“By the grace of God, we can’t allow them to kill millions more Jews or anyone else.”

Gohmert said the Obama administration knows that as long as the U.S. talks with Iran, no matter how “worthless” the talks may be, Israel cannot militarily destroy the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program.

That’s because, he said, Israel knows the Obama administration would side with Iran in the United Nations, and, “This is an affront to Israel.”

“We’re on the brink of disaster,” warned the congressman. He told the largely Jewish crowd he was a Christian who reads the Bible every day.

And, he said, acquaintances of his had claimed to identify the United States in biblical prophecies. He didn’t know about that, but, he remarked, the only chance America had of being around in end times “is to be the best friend of Israel we can.

Talk show host and author Erick Stakelbeck rhetorically asked why should Americans care about the threat posed by ISIS from the other side of the world?

Because, he said, the FBI director recently announced the bureau is investigating ISIS activity in all 50 states.

“The barbarians are not just at the gate, they are inside the gate,” Stakelbeck announced.

But, he said, in such trying times, there is still great reason for hope.

He noted how Israel’s enemies such as Haman, Nebuchadnezzar and Hitler all wound up on the ash heap of history.

“Take heart”, he comforted, “You are on the winning team.”

Kasim Hafeez, a man of Pakistani descent who lived in England, described his conversion from an anti-Zionist Jew hater who became a Muslim Zionist who married a Jew.

He said the turning point came when he read Alan Dershowitz’s book “The Case for Israel,” then went to Israel and fell in love with it.

And, as a Muslim he now works for Christians United for Israel.

Hafeez said, if not for Israel, “I’d be in a jihadist training camp.”

He believes Israeli soldiers aren’t just defending Israel, but the entire free world. Hafeez said Israel’s enemies are America’s enemies. “They target Israel today, America tomorrow.”

“Speaking out for the truth is not Islamophobic,” he declared.

And, Hafeez concluded, “To be free of hatred is incredible.”

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach expressed amazement at “a dinner where people are given awards for simply telling the truth.”

“I’m not pro-Israel because I’m Jewish. I love Israel because I am Jewish. I am pro-Israel because I am an American,” the rabbi declared.

Boteach called Israel is “the greatest blessing to Muslims in the Middle East” because it is the only place they can be free, and it is the only country in the region where women, gays and other minorities are not persecuted.

“If you don’t love Israel, you have no heart,” he summed up.

“Anti-semitism did not die at Auschwitz,” grimly observed honoree Irwin Cotler.

The Canadian member of Parliament told a hushed crowd how Iran executes one person every two hours.

“Unprecedented persecution,” he called it.

Yet, “The world never hears about it.”

Cotler noted it is said there would not be an Israel but for the holocaust, but, he insisted, “It is the other way around: There would not have been a holocaust if they’re had been an Israel.”

Frank Gaffney, assistant secretary of defense during the Reagan administration and current president of the Center for Security Policy, warned about the impending threat to America’s existence posed by Iran.

He saluted the efforts of former CIA Director Adm. James Woolsey, who was in attendance, to alert lawmakers and citizens to the ease with which Iran could knock out America’s electric grid with an electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, attack, by merely exploding a single nuclear bomb over the Midwest.

Gaffeny said it would be a “genocide of unprecedented proportions” eventually resulting in the death of 90 percent of the U.S. population.

“And it could happen at any moment,” especially considering Iran’s partnering with North Korea, which has the technical capability to launch such an attack without detection.

Gaffney noted it would take only $ 2 billion dollars to secure America’s electric grid and neutralize the threat of such an attack, but neither Congress nor the president seemed in any hurry.

He also reminded the audience of the sentiment expressed by former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that destroying America was “not only desirable but possible.”

Sarah Stern, a tireless advocate for Israel, is the founder and president of EMET.

As for the Obama administration’s pursuit of a nuclear deal with Iran, she declared, “We are not negotiating, we are groveling.”

Stern said the president had turned Machiavelli’s advice to “keep your enemies close and your friends at a distance” into, “Hold you enemies close and throw your friends under the bus.”

“Unfortunately, our president does not think like many Americans. He seems to base his foreign policy on how the world ought to be, not how the world actually is.”

She noted how Obama said in an interview he could envision Iran becoming “a very successful regional power.”

This is the same Iran, she noted, that is the world’s leading state sponsor of Islamic terrorism and a state that celebrates “Death to America Day” every year on Nov. 4.

Stern also observed it is also a regime that prosecutes women for being raped and men for being gay.

“The moral universe has been turned upon its head,” she concluded.

“This is 1939 all over again.”

Follow Garth Kant @DCgarth


WND » World
"Iran nukes will be Israel"s gas chambers"

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Iran to Russia: Restore military aid to Syria

Russian President Vladimir Putin with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Russian President Vladimir Putin with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

TEL AVIV –Amid reports of Russia scaling back military support for the Syrian regime, Moscow has responded to an Iranian request to re-establish assistance, with Russian experts traveling to Damascus to advise the embattled regime regarding strategy for counterattacks, informed Middle East defense officials told WND.

Last week, Asharq al Aswat, a popular Arabic language newspaper published in London, reported Russia was reducing its diplomatic staff in Damascus and removing advisers and strategic personnel.

According to the Arabic newspaper, Russian technicians also ceased upholding an agreement with Bashar al-Assad’s regime to help maintain the country’s fleet of Russian-made Sukhoi aircraft, which have been central to Syria’s war against the rebels seeking to depose the regime.

The reported Russian about-face comes as the rebels, including ISIS, have made dramatic gains, taking up to 50 percent of Syria’s territory.

Asharq al Aswat reported the Russian withdrawals had prompted an unscheduled visit to Iran by Syrian Defense Minister Fahd Jassem al-Freij, who was said to have petitioned Tehran to urge Russia to rescind its move.

Middle East defense officials told WND the Iranian appeal has worked, at least somewhat.

They say Russian military advisers are being resent to Syria to rebuild a common war room in the coming two to three weeks capable of advising on counter-attacks against the rebels.

The Russian advisers may find themselves working directly against the U.S. military.

On Tuesday, U.S. and allied forces conducted nine air strikes in Syria against ISIS militants acting near the Turkish border, the U.S. military said. Fourteen more air strikes targeted ISIS in Iraq.


WND » World
Iran to Russia: Restore military aid to Syria

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Obama will sign Iran deal "no matter how bad it is"

President Obama. left, and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif

President Obama. left, and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton says President Obama is likely to sign any nuclear deal he can get with Iran because it’s the centerpiece of his second-term agenda.

In a wide-ranging interview, Bolton also defended his strong support for the NSA’s bulk data collection program that expired Sunday night and explained why he decided against a presidential run in 2016.

The Iranian nuclear threat emerged again on Monday when the New York Times reported that Iran’s enrichment program is ramping up, contrary to Obama administration assurances.

“With only one month left before a deadline to complete a nuclear deal with Iran, international inspectors have reported that Tehran’s stockpile of nuclear fuel increased about 20 percent over the last 18 months of negotiations, partially undercutting the Obama administration’s contention that the Iranian program had been ‘frozen’ during that period,” said the Times in its lead paragraph.

Bolton said this disconnect between administration statements and the true state of Iranian activities raises even more red flags about a formal agreement.

“It underlines just how feckless the president’s policy is with respect to Iran’s nuclear weapons program, how dangerous and how flawed this deal that they’ve been negotiating is turning out to be,” Bolton said in a radio interview with WND and Radio America.

While Bolton thinks the recent injury to Secretary of John Kerry could postpone a final deal with Iran, he firmly believes Obama will take whatever agreement he can get from the mullahs in Tehran.

“The president’s press people have already said this is his second-term signature issue, the equivalent of Obamacare in the first term,” Bolton said. “He’s going to sign a deal with Iran, I’m afraid, with Iran no matter how bad it is.”

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with former U.S. Ambassador John Bolton:

Even if talks were to break down somehow, Bolton believes simply engaging with Iran has done America’s enemy enormous good.

“The administration’s efforts are both legitimizing the regime, which is a tragic mistake, given that it’s still the world’s largest financial supporter of international terrorism,” he said. “It also legitimizes the nuclear program, which really paves the road for Iran to become a nuclear weapons state at a time of its choosing. This is very dangerous.”

Bolton also believes it was dangerous for Congress to let certain aspects of the Patriot Act expire over the weekend and for lawmakers to reject giving the National Security Agency, or NSA, the power to collect bulk data as a means of tracing terrorist connections.

Led by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., lawmakers concerned about the program’s intrusion into Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure succeeded in ending the program that a federal appeals court said was never authorized by Congress in the first place.

On Tuesday, the Senate passed the House version of the USA Freedom Act. Bolton isn’t impressed.

“I think that’s a very poor substitute for the Patriot Act program,” he said.

Under the previous policy, the NSA collected information on every phone call in the U.S., listing both the numbers involved in each call and the duration of the calls. Critics like Sen. Paul contend the government has no right to that information without probable cause.

Bolton disagrees.

“Unless you own a telephone company, if you want to make a phone call, you’ve got to go through a third party. The records we’re talking about are not your records. They’re the telephone company’s billing records,” said Bolton, who says other sources are far more likely to act irresponsibly with Americans’ information.

“These records are like bank records, department store records, Amazon.com records, all of which are sold to other commercial ventures. I think Google and Facebook probably know more about you than the NSA ever will,” he said, adding that the collection of any data beyond the numbers called and the length of those calls requires a Fourth Amendment compliant warrant.

Calling the recent debate “a bizarre moment in American politics,” Bolton, without naming Paul or any other critic of the bulk data collection program, slammed them for what he considers a series of misleading points.

“I think this debate has been characterized by demagoguery and misinformation,” he said. “It’s very hard to catch up with the truth when some of the opponents of the program are saying things that leave many Americans with the implication NSA is listening to their phone calls or reading their emails. Absolutely not true and yet it’s very hard to have a rational discussion when the distortions are so prevalent.”

Bolton also addressed his recent decision not to join the crowded Republican presidential field. After publicly mulling that option for weeks, as he also did in 2012, Bolton ultimately decided running for the highest office in the land without ever holding elected office was not the right move. Still, he believes his motivation for considering a White House bid has succeeded.

“Too many people in the Republican and Democratic Parties don’t understand how critical national security is, Barack Obama at the top of that list. I thought running for president would help restore that attention. Unfortunately, events in the external world have put it back in the center of the debate, and I think it will be one of the very top issues in the 2016 presidential campaign,” Bolton said.

Bolton still expects to be active in the 2016 cycle through his PAC, Super PAC and a new foundation he is starting. He is not endorsing any GOP hopeful at this point but says the Republican nominee must be ready to debate Hillary Clinton and ready to lead in a dangerous world on their first day in office.


WND » World
Obama will sign Iran deal "no matter how bad it is"